Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: Add workaround for Cavium erratum 27456

[David Daney]

On 02/24/2016 10:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:03:02AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> > On 02/24/2016 06:07 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On 24/02/16 13:40, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > (and Catalin, if you pick this up, watch out for the conflicts in
> > > > cpufeature.h)
> > >
> > > Yup, that one is about to become a minefield (ARM64_HAS_NO_HW_PREFETCH,
> > > ARM64_HAS_UAO, ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO and ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN are
> > > already happily clashing into -next). But hey, the more the merrier! ;-)
> >
> > Would you like me to rebase it to for-next/core ?
>
> I think ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN is in the KVM tree, so you're probably
> best off looking at linux-next and choosing your feature number based on
> that, whilst basing the patch on either for-next/core or mainline.

OK, I will do that now.

David.

> Will