Re: [PATCH] ASoC: arizona: Make logging of FLL calculations clearer
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Feb 24 2016 - 20:54:07 EST
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:39:32PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 24/02/16 04:08, Mark Brown wrote:
> >I think that stuff was originally based on the way the datasheets quote
> >things:
> >>- arizona_fll_dbg(fll, "FRATIO=%x(%d) OUTDIV=%x REFCLK_DIV=%x\n",
> >the hex(decimal) but there is certainly very familiar from some of
> >those.
> Indeed, and it was fine on the first codec. Now we've got various revisions
> of the FLL with some fields having different meanings, human error started
> to creep into interpreting the debug.
I'm not saying it's a bad idea to change it, just pointing out where
it's likely to have come from (and the fact that the way the datasheets
were writing this was always a bit weird).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature