Re: fs: NULL deref in atime_needs_update

From: Dmitry Vyukov
Date: Mon Feb 29 2016 - 04:38:31 EST


On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 05:01:34PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
>> Erm... What's to order ->d_inode and ->d_flags fetches there? David?
>> Looks like the barrier in d_is_negative() is on the wrong side of fetch.
>> Confused...
>
> OK, as per David's suggestion, let's flip them around, bringing the
> barrier in d_is_negative() between them. Dmitry, could you try this on
> top of mainline? Again, it's until the first warning.


Good news, I was able to trigger these warnings on a plain C program:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/1a81426b8a5dd3620d6f/raw/fe6d03cfb0d219ad3d979f8bd6c016a5a1b93212/gistfile1.txt
Unfortunately, the failure rate is significantly lower than with
syzkaller. Syzkaller triggered it 8 times in 18 hours on a single VM;
while the C program triggered it once on 2 VMs. Al, maybe you can
modify the program to increase failure rate? I would expect that we
need to clash 2 (or maybe 3) syscalls with right timing to trigger it.
You must have a better idea as to what are these syscalls.
P.S. this is still with the previous patch, not the latest one.