Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add option to turn incompatible pointer check into error

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Mar 08 2016 - 04:19:58 EST



* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > With the introduction of the simple wait API we have two very
> > similar APIs in the kernel. For example wake_up() and swake_up()
> > is only one character away. Although the compiler will warn
> > happily the wrong usage it keeps on going an even links the kernel.
> > Thomas and Peter would rather like to see early missuses reported
> > as error early on.
> >
> > In a first attempt we tried to wrap all swait and wait calls
> > into a macro which has an compile time type assertion. The result
> > was pretty ugly and wasn't able to catch all wrong usages.
> > woken_wake_function(), autoremove_wake_function() and wake_bit_function()
> > are assigned as function pointers. Wrapping them with a macro around is
> > not possible. Prefixing them with '_' was also not a real option
> > because there some users in the kernel which do use them as well.
> > All in all this attempt looked to intrusive and too ugly.
> >
> > An alternative is to turn the pointer type check into an error which
> > catches wrong type uses. Obviously not only the swait/wait ones. That
> > isn't a bad thing either.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Note that there will be a few build failures triggered by this, for example this
fix from linux-next is needed:

> commit db9b60400f9253c25ae639797df2d0ff7a35d9d8
> Author: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Feb 2 11:35:55 2016 +0530
>
> drm/gma500: remove helper function

Other than that:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Ingo