Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:25 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The clock and source clock looked up by the driver may not be available
> just because the clock controller driver was not probed yet so printing
> an error in this case is not correct and only adds confusion to users.
> 
> However, knowing that a driver's probe was deferred may be useful so it
> can be printed as debug information.

Hello again Javier:
> +			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probe deferred due missing rtc clk\n");

Again, intelligible English would not use "due"
but would use "due to" or "because of".

> +				dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
> +					"probe deferred due missing rtc src clk\n");

here too.