Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm/pat: Change pat_disable() to emulate PAT table

[Toshi Kani]

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 11:01 +0000, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:11:16PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > -	pat = PAT(0, WB) | PAT(1, WT) | PAT(2, UC_MINUS) | PAT(3, UC)
> > |
> > -	ÂÂÂÂÂÂPAT(4, WB) | PAT(5, WT) | PAT(6, UC_MINUS) | PAT(7, UC);
> > +	if (cpu_has_pat) {
> 
> Please use on init paths boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) and on fast paths
> static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT). No more of that cpu_has_XXX ugliness.

'cpu_has_pat' is defined as 'boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)'. ÂDo you mean
it should explicitly use 'boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)'?

Thanks,
-Toshi