Re: [PATCH] regulator: Support ramp-up delay for drivers with get_voltage()
From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Mar 30 2016 - 14:32:18 EST
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:17:09AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is for the qcom spmi regulator driver. I seem to have put in the
> set_voltage_time_sel op but missed the fact that the regulator core
> wasn't calling that op to find out how much time to delay. So we have
> raw voltage set and get ops and this selector based delay op.
> Do we need to change the ops to be selector based if we want the
> regulator core to delay after changing voltages? Or do we need to put
> the delay directly into the set_voltage() op in the driver?
You need a consistent set of operations. If you want to use raw
voltages you need to add a raw voltage interface for getting the delay,
not mix selector and non-selector interfaces otherwise we'll run into
problems. It is not sensible to expect a driver that does not use
selectors to implement selectors for some operations, if a driver *does*
use selectors then it should do so consistently. The latter is probably
the more sensible option for this driver since it does have a list
operation so does understand selectors.
Description: PGP signature