+ Sascha
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:48:18PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:35:59AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:What ever happened to this effort?
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx><cut>
This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.hThis is unfortunately a diverges from API available on thermal core. Can
index 97b86c5..6ef932a 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -335,12 +335,14 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
* @get_trend: a pointer to a function that reads the sensor temperature trend.
* @set_emul_temp: a pointer to a function that sets sensor emulated
* temperature.
+ * @set_trips: a pointer to a function that set low/high trip temperature.
*/
struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops {
int (*get_temp)(void *, int *);
int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, int);
int (*set_trip_temp)(void *, int, int);
+ int (*set_trips)(void *, int, int);
you please add first on thermal core then, use it in of thermal?
I don't want to have callbacks available only via of thermal. If we
allow it, OF thermal becomes a separate API.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/59451
Patch 12 and 13 look to accomplish something similar, yet they do what
Eduardo suggested. I was testing that series at my previous job, but
unfortunately (for the fate of this series) I left that employer before
I could finish reviewing and testing it. Perhaps Caesar can resurrect
and test it?
Brian
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip