Re: [RFC PATCH] livepatch: allow removal of a disabled patch
From: Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Tue May 03 2016 - 17:37:18 EST
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> 1. Do we really need a completion? If I am not missing something
> kobject_del() always waits for sysfs callers to leave thanks to kernfs
> active protection.
What do you mean by "kernfs active protection"? I see that
kernfs_remove() gets the kernfs_mutex lock, but I can't find anywhere
that a write to a sysfs file uses that lock.
I'm probably missing something...
--
Josh