Re: [Y2038] [RESEND PATCH 2/3] fs: poll/select/recvmmsg: use timespec64 for timeout events

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed May 04 2016 - 19:51:21 EST

On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
> > acks before I add it to my tree.
> Agreed. Feel free to add my
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> at least (whoever picks it up).

In reply to [1/3] John said

: Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing,
: however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two
: patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so
: they can go via another tree?

However none of the patches are in linux-next.

John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward
substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing

I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.