Re: [Y2038] [RESEND PATCH 2/3] fs: poll/select/recvmmsg: use timespec64 for timeout events

From: John Stultz
Date: Wed May 04 2016 - 20:01:30 EST

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2016 23:08:11 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > But I'm less comfortable making the call on this one. It looks
>> > relatively straight forward, but it would be good to have maintainer
>> > acks before I add it to my tree.
>> Agreed. Feel free to add my
>> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> at least (whoever picks it up).
> In reply to [1/3] John said
> : Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing,
> : however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two
> : patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so
> : they can go via another tree?
> However none of the patches are in linux-next.
> John had qualms about [2/3], but it looks like a straightforward
> substitution in areas which will get plenty of testing

Yea. My main concern is just not stepping on any other maintainers toes.

> I'll grab the patches for now to get them some external testing.

I'd be just as happy if the set went through you Andrew.

For the set: Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>