Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: comedi: Fix WARNING issue in s626.c

From: Ian Abbott
Date: Wed May 18 2016 - 05:27:28 EST


On 17/05/16 11:13, Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya wrote:
This is a patch to the s626.c file that fixes up a Block comments
issues found by the checkpatch.pl tool.

i.e. Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line

Signed-off-by: Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya <ravishankarkm32@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)



I guess this is patch is a replacement for your earlier
"[PATCH 1/4] Staging: comedi: Fix WARNING issue in s626.c". The usual practice is to keep the same patch numbering and to add a "v2" like this: "[PATCH v2 1/4] Staging: comedi: Fix WARNING issue in s626.c". Then add a comment below the "---" line describing what has changed in version 2 of the patch. Remember that Greg and the other higher up maintainers have to sift through hundreds (or at least a large number) of patches a day, so the easier you make it for them, the better.

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
index c5e0863..0e1f535 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s626.c
@@ -76,24 +76,38 @@ struct s626_buffer_dma {

struct s626_private {
uint8_t ai_cmd_running; /* ai_cmd is running */
- unsigned int ai_sample_timer; /* time between samples in
- * units of the timer */
+ unsigned int ai_sample_timer; /*
+ * time between samples in
+ * units of the timer
+ */
int ai_convert_count; /* conversion counter */
- unsigned int ai_convert_timer; /* time between conversion in
- * units of the timer */
- uint16_t counter_int_enabs; /* counter interrupt enable mask
- * for MISC2 register */
+ unsigned int ai_convert_timer; /*
+ * time between conversion in
+ * units of the timer
+ */
+ u16 counter_int_enabs; /*
+ * counter interrupt enable mask
+ * for MISC2 register
+ */
uint8_t adc_items; /* number of items in ADC poll list */
- struct s626_buffer_dma rps_buf; /* DMA buffer used to hold ADC (RPS1)
- * program */
- struct s626_buffer_dma ana_buf; /* DMA buffer used to receive ADC data
- * and hold DAC data */
- uint32_t *dac_wbuf; /* pointer to logical adrs of DMA buffer
- * used to hold DAC data */
+ struct s626_buffer_dma rps_buf; /*
+ * DMA buffer used to hold ADC (RPS1)
+ * program
+ */
+ struct s626_buffer_dma ana_buf; /*
+ * DMA buffer used to receive ADC data
+ * and hold DAC data
+ */
+ u32 *dac_wbuf; /*
+ * pointer to logical adrs of DMA buffer
+ * used to hold DAC data
+ */
uint16_t dacpol; /* image of DAC polarity register */
uint8_t trim_setpoint[12]; /* images of TrimDAC setpoints */
- uint32_t i2c_adrs; /* I2C device address for onboard EEPROM
- * (board rev dependent) */
+ u32 i2c_adrs; /*
+ * I2C device address for onboard EEPROM
+ * (board rev dependent)
+ */
};

There's something weird going on above. In addition to reformatting the comments, it's also replacing the type descriptors of some of the members (using `u32` instead of `uint32_t` etc.). It looks like bits of the patches from your earlier series have crept into this one.

--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-