Hi,Yes, will fix that in V3.
<snip..>
+static bool qup_i2c_check_msg_len(struct i2c_msg *msg) {So we hit this else part for msg->len = 1 and this case blk.pos = 0
+ return ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) && (msg->flags &
I2C_M_RECV_LEN)); }
+
+static int qup_i2c_set_tags_smb(u16 addr, u8 *tags, struct qup_i2c_dev
*qup,
+ struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+ int len = 0;
+ int data_len = qup_i2c_get_data_len(qup);
+
+ if (msg->len > 1) {
+ tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP;
+ tags[len++] = data_len - 1;
+ } else {
will always be true right ?
Yes, but here preferably we use a variable than a number without a context.
+ if (qup->blk.pos == 0) {Even data_len will always be '1' right ?
+ tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
+ tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
+
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
+ tags[len++] = addr >> 8;
+ }
+
+ tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
+ /* 0 implies 256 bytes */
+ if (data_len == QUP_READ_LIMIT)
+ tags[len++] = 0;
+ else
+ tags[len++] = data_len;
+ }
Thanks, will fix that.+ return len;A space around '+' ?
+}
+
static int qup_i2c_set_tags(u8 *tags, struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
struct i2c_msg *msg, int is_dma) { @@ -526,6
+559,10 @@ static int qup_i2c_set_tags(u8 *tags, struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
int last = (qup->blk.pos == (qup->blk.count - 1)) && (qup->is_last);
+ /* Handle tags for SMBus block read */
+ if (qup_i2c_check_msg_len(msg))
+ return qup_i2c_set_tags_smb(addr, tags, qup, msg);
+
if (qup->blk.pos == 0) {
tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
@@ -1065,9 +1102,17 @@ static int qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct
qup_i2c_dev *qup,
struct i2c_msg *msg)
{
u32 val;
- int idx, pos = 0, ret = 0, total;
+ int idx, pos = 0, ret = 0, total, msg_offset = 0;
+ /*
+ * If the message length is already read in
+ * the first byte of the buffer, account for
+ * that by setting the offset
+ */
+ if (qup_i2c_check_msg_len(msg) && (msg->len > 1))
+ msg_offset = 1;
total = qup_i2c_get_data_len(qup);
+ total -= msg_offset;
/* 2 extra bytes for read tags */
while (pos < (total + 2)) {
@@ -1087,8 +1132,8 @@ static int qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct
qup_i2c_dev *qup,
if (pos >= (total + 2))
goto out;
-
- msg->buf[qup->pos++] = val & 0xff;
+ msg->buf[qup->pos+msg_offset] = val & 0xff;
No, qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2 is needed so that we read rest of the data that is indicated by the length we read earlier.
+ qup->pos++;Is the issue_xfer_v2 needed inside this here ?
}
}
@@ -1128,6 +1173,22 @@ static int qup_i2c_read_one_v2(struct
qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
goto err;
qup->blk.pos++;
+
+ /* Handle SMBus block read length */
+ if (qup_i2c_check_msg_len(msg) && (msg->len == 1)) {
+ if (msg->buf[0] > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) {
+ ret = -EPROTO;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ msg->len += msg->buf[0];
+ qup->pos = 0;
+ qup_i2c_set_read_mode_v2(qup, msg->len);
+ qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(qup, msg);
+ ret = qup_i2c_wait_for_complete(qup, msg);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+ qup_i2c_set_blk_data(qup, msg);Regards,
+ }
} while (qup->blk.pos < qup->blk.count);
Sricharan