Re: [git pull] drm for v4.7

[Dave Airlie]

On 24 May 2016 at 05:23, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 05:20, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 24 May 2016 at 04:59, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's the main drm pull request for 4.7, it's been
>>>> a busy one, and I've been a bit more distracted in
>>>> real life this merge window.
>>>
>>> Hmm.
>>>
>>> I pulled this, but I think I'll have to unpull again.
>>>
>>> Neither the diffstat not the shortlog match what you sent me. There's
>>> four extra commits at the top that aren't mentioned:
>>>
>>>   Dave Airlie (3):
>>>       drm/edid: move displayid tiled block parsing into separate function.
>>>       drm/edid: move displayid validation to it's own function.
>>>       drm/edid: add displayid detailed 1 timings to the modelist. (v1.1)
>>>
>>>   Tomas Bzatek (1):
>>>       drm/displayid: Iterate over all DisplayID blocks
>>>
>>> was that intentional? What happened? Are those commits meant to be
>>> merged, or are they wrong? They _look_ ok, but dammit, according to
>>> your message they shouldn't be there.
>>
>> Okay they are meant to be in there, I just had them on my merge list,
>> remembered I hadn't merged them, but had generated a pull request earlier
>> to edit for you and forgot to regenerate it. I'll follow up with a new
>> pull request
>> if you like just to keep things straight.
>>
>> The "extern C" warnings were one of the patches Arnd sent, I'll follow up with
>> those today.

FYI:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/87900/

is a link to Arnd's patch.

Dave.