Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] mm, vmscan: use proper classzone_idx in should_continue_reclaim()

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 06/01/2016 04:21 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-05-16 15:08:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [...]
>> @@ -2364,11 +2350,12 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>> -			bool is_classzone)
>> +			int classzone_idx)
>>  {
>>  	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
>>  	bool reclaimable = false;
>> +	bool is_classzone = (classzone_idx == zone_idx(zone));
>>  
>>  	do {
>>  		struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
>> @@ -2450,7 +2437,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>>  			reclaimable = true;
>>  
>>  	} while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
>> -					 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
>> +			 sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc, classzone_idx));
>>  
>>  	return reclaimable;
>>  }
>> @@ -2580,7 +2567,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
>>  			/* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
>>  		}
>>  
>> -		shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
>> +		shrink_zone(zone, sc, classzone_idx);
> 
> this should be is_classzone, right?

No, this is shrink_zones() context, not shrink_zone().