Re: [very-RFC 6/8] Add TSN event-tracing

From: Henrik Austad
Date: Sun Jun 12 2016 - 17:25:27 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [TEST PATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new"
Previous message: Kieran Bingham: "[TEST PATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [very-RFC 6/8] Add TSN event-tracing"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [very-RFC 6/8] Add TSN event-tracing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:58:03PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 01:01:34 +0200
> Henrik Austad <henrik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Henrik Austad <haustad@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This needs refactoring and should be updated to use TRACE_CLASS, but for
> > now it provides a fair debug-window into TSN.
> >
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:TRACING)
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:TRACING)
> > Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <haustad@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/trace/events/tsn.h | 349 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 349 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/trace/events/tsn.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/tsn.h b/include/trace/events/tsn.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ac1f31b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/tsn.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@
> > +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> > +#define TRACE_SYSTEM tsn
> > +
> > +#if !defined(_TRACE_TSN_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> > +#define _TRACE_TSN_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/tsn.h>
> > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/if_ether.h>
> > +#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> > +/* #include <linux/skbuff.h> */
> > +
> > +/* FIXME: update to TRACE_CLASS to reduce overhead */
>
> I'm curious to why I didn't do this now. A class would make less
> duplication of typing too ;-)

Yeah, I found this in a really great article written by some tracing-dude,
I hear he talks really, really fast!

https://lwn.net/Articles/381064/

> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_buffer_write,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + size_t bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, size)
> > + __field(size_t, bsize)
> > + __field(size_t, size_left)
> > + __field(void *, buffer)
> > + __field(void *, head)
> > + __field(void *, tail)
> > + __field(void *, end)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->size = bytes;
> > + __entry->bsize = link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->size_left = (link->head - link->tail) % link->used_buffer_size;
>
> Move this logic into the print statement, since you save head and tail.

Ok, any particular reason?

> > + __entry->buffer = link->buffer;
> > + __entry->head = link->head;
> > + __entry->tail = link->tail;
> > + __entry->end = link->end;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu, copy=%zd, buffer: %zd, avail=%zd, [buffer=%p, head=%p, tail=%p, end=%p]",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->size, __entry->bsize, __entry->size_left,
>
> __entry->stream_id, __entry->size, __entry->bsize,
> (__entry->head - __entry->tail) % __entry->bsize,
>

Ok, so is this about saving space by dropping one intermediate value, or is
it some other point I'm missing here?

> > + __entry->buffer, __entry->head, __entry->tail, __entry->end)
> > +
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_buffer_write_net,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + size_t bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, size)
> > + __field(size_t, bsize)
> > + __field(size_t, size_left)
> > + __field(void *, buffer)
> > + __field(void *, head)
> > + __field(void *, tail)
> > + __field(void *, end)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->size = bytes;
> > + __entry->bsize = link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->size_left = (link->head - link->tail) % link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->buffer = link->buffer;
> > + __entry->head = link->head;
> > + __entry->tail = link->tail;
> > + __entry->end = link->end;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu, copy=%zd, buffer: %zd, avail=%zd, [buffer=%p, head=%p, tail=%p, end=%p]",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->size, __entry->bsize, __entry->size_left,
> > + __entry->buffer, __entry->head, __entry->tail, __entry->end)
> > +
> > + );
> > +
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_buffer_read,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + size_t bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, size)
> > + __field(size_t, bsize)
> > + __field(size_t, size_left)
> > + __field(void *, buffer)
> > + __field(void *, head)
> > + __field(void *, tail)
> > + __field(void *, end)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->size = bytes;
> > + __entry->bsize = link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->size_left = (link->head - link->tail) % link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->buffer = link->buffer;
> > + __entry->head = link->head;
> > + __entry->tail = link->tail;
> > + __entry->end = link->end;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu, copy=%zd, buffer: %zd, avail=%zd, [buffer=%p, head=%p, tail=%p, end=%p]",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->size, __entry->bsize, __entry->size_left,
> > + __entry->buffer, __entry->head, __entry->tail, __entry->end)
> > +
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_refill,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + size_t reported_avail),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, reported_avail),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, bsize)
> > + __field(size_t, size_left)
> > + __field(size_t, reported_left)
> > + __field(size_t, low_water)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->bsize = link->used_buffer_size;
> > + __entry->size_left = (link->head - link->tail) % link->used_buffer_size;
>
> As you don't save head and tail here, this logic needs to remain.
>
> > + __entry->reported_left = reported_avail;
> > + __entry->low_water = link->low_water_mark;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu, buffer=%zd, avail=%zd, reported=%zd, low=%zd",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->bsize, __entry->size_left, __entry->reported_left, __entry->low_water)
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_send_batch,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + int num_send,
> > + u64 ts_base_ns,
> > + u64 ts_delta_ns),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, num_send, ts_base_ns, ts_delta_ns),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(int, seqnr)
> > + __field(int, num_send)
> > + __field(u64, ts_base_ns)
> > + __field(u64, ts_delta_ns)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->seqnr = (int)link->last_seqnr;
> > + __entry->ts_base_ns = ts_base_ns;
> > + __entry->ts_delta_ns = ts_delta_ns;
> > + __entry->num_send = num_send;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu, seqnr=%d, num_send=%d, ts_base_ns=%llu, ts_delta_ns=%llu",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->seqnr, __entry->num_send, __entry->ts_base_ns, __entry->ts_delta_ns)
> > + );
> > +
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_rx_handler,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + const struct ethhdr *ethhdr,
> > + u64 sid),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, ethhdr, sid),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(char *, name)
> > + __field(u16, proto)
> > + __field(u64, sid)
> > + __field(u64, link_sid)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->name = link->nic->name;
> > + __entry->proto = ethhdr->h_proto;
> > + __entry->sid = sid;
> > + __entry->link_sid = link->stream_id;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("name=%s, proto: 0x%04x, stream_id=%llu, link->sid=%llu",
> > + __entry->name, ntohs(__entry->proto), __entry->sid, __entry->link_sid)
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_du,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link,
> > + size_t bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, link_sid)
> > + __field(size_t, bytes)
> > + ),
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->link_sid = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->bytes = bytes;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu,bytes=%zu",
> > + __entry->link_sid, __entry->bytes)
> > +);
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_set_buffer,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link, size_t bufsize),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, bufsize),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, size)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->size = bufsize;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu,buffer_size=%zu",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->size)
> > +
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_free_buffer,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, bufsize)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->bufsize = link->buffer_size;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu,size:%zd",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->bufsize)
> > +
> > + );
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_buffer_drain,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link, size_t used),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, used),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(size_t, used)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->used = used;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu,used=%zu",
> > + __entry->stream_id, __entry->used)
> > +
> > +);
> > +/* TODO: too long, need cleanup.
> > + */
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tsn_pre_tx,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(struct tsn_link *link, struct sk_buff *skb, size_t bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(link, skb, bytes),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(u64, stream_id)
> > + __field(u32, vlan_tag)
> > + __field(size_t, bytes)
> > + __field(size_t, data_len)
> > + __field(unsigned int, headlen)
> > + __field(u16, protocol)
> > + __field(u16, prot_native)
> > + __field(int, tx_idx)
> > + __field(u16, mac_len)
> > + __field(u16, hdr_len)
> > + __field(u16, vlan_tci)
> > + __field(u16, mac_header)
> > + __field(unsigned int, tail)
> > + __field(unsigned int, end)
> > + __field(unsigned int, truesize)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->stream_id = link->stream_id;
> > + __entry->vlan_tag = (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) ? skb_vlan_tag_get(skb) : 0);
> > + __entry->bytes = bytes;
> > + __entry->data_len = skb->data_len;
> > + __entry->headlen = skb_headlen(skb);
> > + __entry->protocol = ntohs(vlan_get_protocol(skb));
>
> Maybe it would be better to do the ntohs() in the TP_printk() as well.
>
> > + __entry->prot_native = ntohs(skb->protocol);
>
> here too.
>
> > + __entry->tx_idx = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
> > +
> > + __entry->mac_len = skb->mac_len;
> > + __entry->hdr_len = skb->hdr_len;
> > + __entry->vlan_tci = skb->vlan_tci;
> > + __entry->mac_header = skb->mac_header;
> > + __entry->tail = (unsigned int)skb->tail;
> > + __entry->end = (unsigned int)skb->end;
> > + __entry->truesize = skb->truesize;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("stream_id=%llu,vlan_tag=0x%04x,data_size=%zd,data_len=%zd,headlen=%u,proto=0x%04x (0x%04x),tx_idx=%d,mac_len=%u,hdr_len=%u,vlan_tci=0x%02x,mac_header=0x%02x,tail=%u,end=%u,truesize=%u",
> > + __entry->stream_id,
> > + __entry->vlan_tag,
> > + __entry->bytes,
> > + __entry->data_len,
> > + __entry->headlen,
> > + __entry->protocol,
> > + __entry->prot_native, __entry->tx_idx,
> > + __entry->mac_len,
> > + __entry->hdr_len,
> > + __entry->vlan_tci,
> > + __entry->mac_header,
>
> Is this an ether mac header? If so we support %M. But as it's defined
> as only u16, it doesn't seem like it can be.

Actually, looking at the output, I'm not quite sure what it is that I
wanted to grab with that, the skb->mac_header should give an offset into
the header-area of skb, so it should be a constant offset from skb->head
(that is an actual pointer).

I *think* I wanted to make sure I updated things correctly so that the
offset didn't suddenly change, but the fact that I'm no longer sure
indicates that I should just drop that one. That whole printout is too long
anyway..

Thanks for pointing a finger at this!

I'm still a bit stymied as to why logic should be in TP_printk() and not
TP_fast_assign(). Not that I really have any preferences either way, just
curious.

--
Henrik Austad

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [TEST PATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new"
Previous message: Kieran Bingham: "[TEST PATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new"
In reply to: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [very-RFC 6/8] Add TSN event-tracing"
Next in thread: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [very-RFC 6/8] Add TSN event-tracing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]