Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available

From: Saeed Mahameed
Date: Fri Jun 17 2016 - 10:50:43 EST


On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions
> in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch
> that introduces a problem gets added.
>

The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it
makes some unwanted noise
so we will remove it until we figure it out.

>
> Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the
> unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64()
> or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again?
>

Yes, same thing, already fixed, will reply to that thread.