Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri Jun 17 2016 - 11:01:26 EST
On Friday, June 17, 2016 5:50:14 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:04:54 PM CEST Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > Ok, I see. It would be nice if the process had a way to avoid build regressions
> > in linux-next, in particular if you already have a fix by the time a patch
> > that introduces a problem gets added.
> >
>
> The reason we added this tree is to get 0-day testing but currently it
> makes some unwanted noise
> so we will remove it until we figure it out.
I think you can simply ask Fengguang Wu to add your git tree to the list
of trees he pulls from for the 0-day test bot.
> > Can you check if the fix for the second problem correctly removes the
> > unnecessary 64-bit division (as opposed to adding a call to div_s64()
> > or do_div()), and if it removes all traces of 'struct timespec' again?
> >
>
> Yes, same thing, already fixed, will reply to that thread.
Ok, thanks for the confirmation!
Arnd