Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'
From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Fri Jun 17 2016 - 11:01:13 EST
- Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available"
- Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA: ctxfi: Change structure initialisation to C99 style"
- In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'"
- Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday 17 June 2016 04:52 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Crud, I messed up the rebase against the backoff reverts. Lemme go do
>>> fixups.
>>
>> I've misplaced my arc compiler, but does this make it go again?
>>
> Looks like it, yes. Build still fails for another reason, but this problem is gone.
> I can not do any runtime tests, though, only build tests.
>
> Guenter
We can do that once Peter adjusts his patch !
-Vineet
- Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] mlx5: only register devlink when ethernet is available"
- Previous message: Takashi Iwai: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA: ctxfi: Change structure initialisation to C99 style"
- In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'"
- Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]