Re: cmpxchg and x86 flags output

From: David Howells
Date: Wed Jun 22 2016 - 12:11:43 EST

Next message: David Howells: "[PATCH net-next 10/14] rxrpc: Calls displayed in /proc may in future lack a connection [ver #2]"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: as3722: convert PINCTRL_AS3722 from bool to tristate"
In reply to: David Howells: "Re: cmpxchg and x86 flags output"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: cmpxchg and x86 flags output"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The question for me is for things like lock patching that we do on x86...

This might be pertinent to what you're asking:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70973

David

Next message: David Howells: "[PATCH net-next 10/14] rxrpc: Calls displayed in /proc may in future lack a connection [ver #2]"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: as3722: convert PINCTRL_AS3722 from bool to tristate"
In reply to: David Howells: "Re: cmpxchg and x86 flags output"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: cmpxchg and x86 flags output"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]