Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] USB Audio Gadget refactoring

From: Clemens Ladisch
Date: Fri Jul 15 2016 - 03:50:12 EST

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [lkp] [mm, memcg] 849400b8b0: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/memcontrol.c:998 mem_cgroup_update_lru_size+0x220/0x297"
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH 34/34] mm, vmstat: remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries"
In reply to: Ruslan Bilovol: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] USB Audio Gadget refactoring"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Ruslan Bilovol
>> <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> it may break current usecase for some people

And what are the benefits that justify breaking the kernel API?

Regards,
Clemens

Next message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [lkp] [mm, memcg] 849400b8b0: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/memcontrol.c:998 mem_cgroup_update_lru_size+0x220/0x297"
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: [PATCH 34/34] mm, vmstat: remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries"
In reply to: Ruslan Bilovol: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] USB Audio Gadget refactoring"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]