Re: [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead

[Michal Hocko]

On Thu 18-08-16 16:26:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
> b) doesn't it try to be overly clever when doing that in the caller
> doesn't cost all that much? Sure you can save few bytes in the spaces
> but then I would just argue to use \t rather than fixed string length.

ohh, I misread the code. It tries to emulate the width formater. But is
this really necessary? Do we know about any tools doing a fixed string
parsing?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs