Re: [PATCH v3] stop_machine: Make migration_cpu_stop() does useful works for CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Sep 14 2016 - 03:50:26 EST

Next message: Kishon Vijay Abraham I: "[PATCH 30/51] extcon: Add the support for the capability of each property"
Previous message: Kishon Vijay Abraham I: "[PATCH 31/51] extcon: Rename the extcon_set/get_state() to maintain the function naming pattern"
In reply to: Cheng Chao: "Re: [PATCH v3] stop_machine: Make migration_cpu_stop() does useful works for CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH v3] stop_machine: Make migration_cpu_stop() does useful works for CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:07:14AM +0800, Cheng Chao wrote:
>
> great, __schedule() doesn't need pay any attention to the TASK_DEAD now.

There's still __schedule()->context_switch()->finish_task_switch().

Next message: Kishon Vijay Abraham I: "[PATCH 30/51] extcon: Add the support for the capability of each property"
Previous message: Kishon Vijay Abraham I: "[PATCH 31/51] extcon: Rename the extcon_set/get_state() to maintain the function naming pattern"
In reply to: Cheng Chao: "Re: [PATCH v3] stop_machine: Make migration_cpu_stop() does useful works for CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH v3] stop_machine: Make migration_cpu_stop() does useful works for CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]