Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk/Renesas-MSTP: Less function calls in cpg_mstp_clocks_init() after error detection

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Sep 15 2016 - 15:11:21 EST


Hi Markus,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:30:27 +0200
>
> The kfree() function was called in up to two cases
> by the cpg_mstp_clocks_init() function during error handling even if
> the passed variable contained a null pointer.

It's perfectly legal to call kfree() on a NULL pointer.

> * Split a condition check for memory allocation failures so that
> each pointer from these function calls will be checked immediately.
>
> See also background information:
> Topic "CWE-754: Improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions"
> Link: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/754.html
>
> * Return directly after a call of the function "kzalloc" failed
> at the beginning.

Both calls are already close together.

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

In addition, your patch increases the LoC, IMHO without improving the code.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> index 1fdc44b..6c82e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/clk-mstp.c
> @@ -167,10 +167,12 @@ static void __init cpg_mstp_clocks_init(struct device_node *np)
> unsigned int i;
>
> group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!group)
> + return;
> +
> clks = kmalloc_array(MSTP_MAX_CLOCKS, sizeof(*clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (group == NULL || clks == NULL) {
> + if (!clks) {
> kfree(group);
> - kfree(clks);
> return;
> }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds