Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Christian KÃnig]

Am 23.09.2016 um 12:20 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> > Additional to that I don't really see the point in renaming some of the jump labels,
> I am suggesting changes for another collateral software evolution.
>
>
> > if you call it "restart" or "lock_restart" doesn't make much difference.
> Do other identifiers fit better to a specification from the document "CodingStyle"
> like the following?

No, not really.

> "…
> Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists.
> …"
>
>
> Does this wording need any more adjustments?

Of hand I can't find any better wording.

It's just the names like "out" or "restart" perfectly explain why the 
labels exists. So they fulfill this requirement from the coding style as 
far as I can see.

So why do you want to change them?

Regards,
Christian.

> Regards,
> Markus