Re: Fwd: Re: Patchwork [1/1] staging: ks7010: Attempt to structure and format to standards

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Marcel Xubuntu wrote:
> 
> Code formatting and structuring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> Tested-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Mostly code formatting, unapologetically a stepping stone for a potential
> refactoring with a knowledge seeking, following complete disclosure,
> ultimate goal.
> In case this fails, my backup plan is to have the world's record for the
> quickest kernel patch dismissal, either way it's a win. Did I win ?!

Why did you repeat this?

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> index b7337fd..8de2713 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>   #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
>   #include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h>
>   #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> -#include <asm/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>

Patch is corrupted and can not be applied :(

Also, you didn't read the link I provided in the last review, please do
so and fix up the patch to only do one type of a thing at a time.
(hint, "fix all checkpatch issues" is not one thing...)

thanks,

greg k-h