On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Marcel Xubuntu wrote:I like repeating things sometimes.
Code formatting and structuring.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Tested-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>
Mostly code formatting, unapologetically a stepping stone for a potential
refactoring with a knowledge seeking, following complete disclosure,
ultimate goal.
In case this fails, my backup plan is to have the world's record for the
quickest kernel patch dismissal, either way it's a win. Did I win ?!
Why did you repeat this?
Yes, this was an exercise in reconnaissance. I don't want the name of Ricquier correlated with some meaningless style fixing on code that is beyond repair and provides an entry point for outsiders.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
index b7337fd..8de2713 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
#include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
Patch is corrupted and can not be applied :(
I did, see above. A real patch is outstanding.
Also, you didn't read the link I provided in the last review, please do
so and fix up the patch to only do one type of a thing at a time.
(hint, "fix all checkpatch issues" is not one thing...)
thank you!
thanks,
greg k-h