Re: Fwd: Re: Patchwork [1/1] staging: ks7010: Attempt to structure and format to standards

From: Marcel Xubuntu
Date: Sun Sep 25 2016 - 06:51:35 EST


On 9/25/16 12:34, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Marcel Xubuntu wrote:

Code formatting and structuring.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>

---

Tested-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@xxxxxxxxx>

Mostly code formatting, unapologetically a stepping stone for a potential
refactoring with a knowledge seeking, following complete disclosure,
ultimate goal.
In case this fails, my backup plan is to have the world's record for the
quickest kernel patch dismissal, either way it's a win. Did I win ?!

Why did you repeat this?
I like repeating things sometimes.

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
index b7337fd..8de2713 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
#include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/atomic.h>

Patch is corrupted and can not be applied :(
Yes, this was an exercise in reconnaissance. I don't want the name of Ricquier correlated with some meaningless style fixing on code that is beyond repair and provides an entry point for outsiders.

Also, you didn't read the link I provided in the last review, please do
so and fix up the patch to only do one type of a thing at a time.
(hint, "fix all checkpatch issues" is not one thing...)
I did, see above. A real patch is outstanding.

thanks,
thank you!

greg k-h