Re: md/dm-crypt: Rename a jump label in crypt_message() ?
From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Fri Sep 30 2016 - 08:55:10 EST
> If you continue discussing after that point,
I guess that such a condition is not needed.
> then you make a clear statement that it isn't an accident.
I hope that most of my software development activities are not "an accident".
Is the intent for any update suggestion (like the renaming of a jump label
in this case) reasonable to some degree?
> You are deliberately wasting their time.
I imagine that I do not really try to "waste" others time. But I am trying
also to change some "things".
There are circumstances when these contributions are interpreted as "wasted efforts".
Is the change acceptance usually higher for other update patterns?
> Something along "I will not listen.
I am listening while my responses might not fit to your current expectations.
> I will not change.
I have got also some personal change opportunities.
> Nothing you tell me will ever make it worth your time to do so"?
While you can be so clear about a rejection for this software module at the moment,
other contributors showed occasionally more positive information.