Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula

From: Fabio Estevam
Date: Tue Oct 11 2016 - 14:27:29 EST

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
> I think the patches should fix the issue.

That's good news. Thanks for testing.

Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.


Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.