Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula

[Otavio Salvador]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
>> I think the patches should fix the issue.
>
> That's good news. Thanks for testing.
>
> Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.
>
> Emil,
>
> Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.

And what will be done regarding 4.8? Is the faulty change to be
reverted or this patches will be backported?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750