[PATCH 3.12 54/84] ARM: sa1111: fix pcmcia suspend/resume

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 06dfe5cc0cc684e735cb0232fdb756d30780b05d upstream.

SA1111 PCMCIA was broken when PCMCIA switched to using dev_pm_ops for
the PCMCIA socket class.  PCMCIA used to handle suspend/resume via the
socket hosting device, which happened at normal device suspend/resume
time.

However, the referenced commit changed this: much of the resume now
happens much earlier, in the noirq resume handler of dev_pm_ops.

However, on SA1111, the PCMCIA device is not accessible as the SA1111
has not been resumed at _noirq time.  It's slightly worse than that,
because the SA1111 has already been put to sleep at _noirq time, so
suspend doesn't work properly.

Fix this by converting the core SA1111 code to use dev_pm_ops as well,
and performing its own suspend/resume at noirq time.

This fixes these errors in the kernel log:

pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: time out after reset
pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket1: time out after reset

and the resulting lack of PCMCIA cards after a S2RAM cycle.

Fixes: d7646f7632549 ("pcmcia: use dev_pm_ops for class pcmcia_socket_class")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
index e57d7e5bf96a..932125a20877 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -872,9 +872,9 @@ struct sa1111_save_data {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 
-static int sa1111_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+static int sa1111_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct sa1111_save_data *save;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int val;
@@ -937,9 +937,9 @@ static int sa1111_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
  *	restored by their respective drivers, and must be called
  *	via LDM after this function.
  */
-static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
+static int sa1111_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct sa1111 *sachip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct sa1111 *sachip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct sa1111_save_data *save;
 	unsigned long flags, id;
 	void __iomem *base;
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
 	id = sa1111_readl(sachip->base + SA1111_SKID);
 	if ((id & SKID_ID_MASK) != SKID_SA1111_ID) {
 		__sa1111_remove(sachip);
-		platform_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
+		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
 		kfree(save);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -1006,8 +1006,8 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
 }
 
 #else
-#define sa1111_suspend NULL
-#define sa1111_resume  NULL
+#define sa1111_suspend_noirq NULL
+#define sa1111_resume_noirq  NULL
 #endif
 
 static int sa1111_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -1041,6 +1041,11 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct dev_pm_ops sa1111_pm_ops = {
+	.suspend_noirq = sa1111_suspend_noirq,
+	.resume_noirq = sa1111_resume_noirq,
+};
+
 /*
  *	Not sure if this should be on the system bus or not yet.
  *	We really want some way to register a system device at
@@ -1053,11 +1058,10 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static struct platform_driver sa1111_device_driver = {
 	.probe		= sa1111_probe,
 	.remove		= sa1111_remove,
-	.suspend	= sa1111_suspend,
-	.resume		= sa1111_resume,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "sa1111",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.pm	= &sa1111_pm_ops,
 	},
 };
 
-- 
2.10.1