Re: Kildall

[Ove BjÃrn Karlsen]

Den 10/16/2016 22:41, skrev jdow:
> On 2016-10-16 13:12, Ove BjÃrn Karlsen wrote:
> > Den 10/15/2016 23:19, skrev jdow:
> > > On 2016-10-15 05:31, Ove BjÃrn Karlsen wrote:
> > > > Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove BjÃrn Karlsen:
> > > > > Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove BjÃrn Karlsen:
> > > > > > Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove BjÃrn Karlsen:
> > > > > > > I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
> > > > > > > Karmic
> > > > > > > Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
> > > > > > > recognition of my
> > > > > > > later low-jitter work it would seem. (That actually removed all 
> > > > > > > "disk read"
> > > > > > > stops, from high-performance demanding games like Doom 3. 
> > > > > > > Enabling a fluent
> > > > > > > 3x72 fps, since the engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
> > > > > > > Microsoft
> > > > > > > could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some 
> > > > > > > real issue,
> > > > > > > some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have 
> > > > > > > been the Bill
> > > > > > > Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M
> > > > > > > (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied 
> > > > > > > as MS-DOS.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. 
> > > > > > > Gary Kildall
> > > > > > > had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here in 
> > > > > > > Norway even
> > > > > > > seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While many know the 
> > > > > > > enthusiast
> > > > > > > computing environment have had their brilliant people.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business 
> > > > > > > Practises", one
> > > > > > > should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
> > > > > > > admitted to
> > > > > > > have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
> > > > > > > leave "MS"
> > > > > > > support for the same.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
> > > > > > > some new OS
> > > > > > > have a chance :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
> > > > > > > innerloop
> > > > > > > construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated language, 
> > > > > > > making most
> > > > > > > of the OS language one, and usable by newbies and advanced, that 
> > > > > > > might make
> > > > > > > assembly aswell. Where often used library macros could 
> > > > > > > ultimately be made in
> > > > > > > H/W and accelerated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
> > > > > > > flag, and be
> > > > > > > american supergun... :|
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or.. make a music video: 
> > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peaceful Saluations.
> > > > > > So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys 
> > > > > > Metaphysical Laws.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding 
> > > > > > concept. (Probably
> > > > > > not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was that.)
> > > > > > .                                  .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peaceful Salutations.
> > > > > I also wrote this:
> > > > > https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10 
> > > > Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone 
> > > > wanting me to
> > > > work with this, and finance it, I would.
> > > >
> > > > RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen 
> > > > men in the
> > > > world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so 
> > > > many
> > > > obscurities we find with the modern internet.
> > > >
> > > > Peaceful Salutations.
> > >
> > > Just off hand after between 15 and 20 years monitoring the LKML the 
> > > fellows
> > > here didn't bother to read the rant. And incidentally, Gary Kildall 
> > > was an
> > > American first with ancestors from your neck of the woods. He spoke 
> > > American
> > > English with no more accent than a few stiff drinks might cause. I 
> > > met him at
> > > a computer convention many years ago and had the chance to chatter 
> > > with him.
> > > So if you're getting all national pride, you're being a little 
> > > silly. Next
> > > time approach it without the rant. It might get a better reception. 
> > > This group
> > > does NOT go for demonstrations of ego in the code or newbie coders.
> > >
> > > {^_^}
> >
> > I do not need to you speak of behalf of "the fellows". And, no, I am 
> > not a
> > newbie coder, I have done some of the worlds best DSP, beating all your
> > contemporary recordlabels, better kernel configs than most here, and the
> > philosophy I present is also better than all current Microsoft, 
> > Linux, CP/M etc,
> > that honestly, are all based in phallic totems, that can never really 
> > be truly
> > good.
> >
> > It is that point of intelligence, beyond phallic totems, that people 
> > truly
> > should reach for. However to become conscious of this, and actually 
> > do it, seems
> > hard, in a culture where 99% of it, seems phallic based, thought 
> > relevant to
> > mindreducing drugs, or citypromiscuity and liqour. And even it all is 
> > about sex
> > and ofcourse really children, many of these doesnÂt even hit the mark 
> > there.
> >
> > I have gone there though, and made it simpler for the rest. Follow, 
> > Intelligent
> > People.
> >
> > My summary of research on religion has been top 1% research on 
> > Academia aswell,
> > and is available here: https://independent.academia.edu/OveKarlsen
> >
> > Peaceful Salutations
>
> It's not me you have to convince. I'm more an observer than a 
> contributor, although there is a miniscule bit of my coding in the 
> pile of other people's contributions. I'm mostly just an interested 72 
> year old lady who tried to make an observation. Your emails bristle 
> with ego, rightly or wrongly. The kernel developers do not take kindly 
> to king size egos and tend to bruise them severely. They are very big 
> on proven contributions politely offered. And as far as this group 
> goes, you are a newbie according to the group's dynamics. You 
> contribute, you build your reputation, and eventually you're a full 
> blown contributor who is no longer a newbie. I was speaking of newbie 
> to the group not to coding in general.
>
> What does researching religion have to do with the price of tea on the 
> Moon let alone the LKML? At least you picked a topic that people 
> should be investigating these days. The first time I bounced on 
> examining that particular ideology may have your birth by a goodly 
> number of years. Every time I've looked at it since I've become more 
> disgusted with it. It's humanities collective suicide pact wrapped in 
> pig intestines and served up as sausage, which is totally enough said 
> about an odious topic.
>
> {^_^}

This is the kind of nutter who likes a phallic totem, guys. Is that the 
kind of company you would prefer? Obviously the internet truly needs a 
correct paradigm.

Peaceful Salutations,
Ove BjÃrn Karlsen
AKA Admirer Of Paradox Theos.

PS: I am also testing my philosophy in pop culture: 
https://www.internetdj.com/user/1648283118719701_fb