Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support

[Neil Armstrong]

On 10/18/2016 01:08 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> great to see progress towards supporting OX820!
> The NAND driver I hacked up for Kernel 4.1 and 4.4 in OpenWrt/LEDE
> looks very similar, see
> 
> https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/dangole/staging.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/oxnas/files/drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c;h=f5a142950e32227fee304de731e619278350a91b;hb=refs/heads/oxnas-nand
> 
> To me therefore this looks quite good, just one small question below.

Hi Daniel,

Yes, I work step by step, I hope to have something booting for 4.10 !

Indeed, they look identical except the part_probes[] stuff, are they necessary ?

My primary source of code was Ma Haiju's tree and OPenWRT's tree, but would some people like to push some of the openwrt driver upstream somehow ?

Thanks,
Neil

> 
> Cheers
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:09:27AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Add NAND driver to support the Oxford Semiconductor OX820 NAND Controller.
>> This is a simple memory mapped NAND controller with single chip select and
>> software ECC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/oxnas-nand.txt         |  24 ++++
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig                           |   5 +
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile                          |   1 +
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c                      | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/oxnas-nand.txt
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c
>>

[...]

>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ee402ab
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/oxnas_nand.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Oxford Semiconductor OXNAS NAND driver
>> + *
>> + * Heavily based on plat_nand.c :
>> + * Author: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@xxxxxxxxx>

Hmm, I forgot the OpenWRT and Ma Haijun copyrights here...

>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
>> +
>> +/* nand commands */
>> +#define NAND_CMD_ALE		BIT(18)
>> +#define NAND_CMD_CLE		BIT(19)
>> +#define NAND_CMD_CS		0
>> +#define NAND_CMD_RESET		0xff
>> +#define NAND_CMD		(NAND_CMD_CS | NAND_CMD_CLE)
>> +#define NAND_ADDR		(NAND_CMD_CS | NAND_CMD_ALE)
>> +#define NAND_DATA		(NAND_CMD_CS)
>> +
>> +struct oxnas_nand_data {
>> +	struct nand_chip	chip;
>> +	void __iomem		*io_base;
> 
> Why do you redundantly keep io_base in platform data rather than
> just using chip.IO_ADDR_R and >chip.IO_ADDR_W?

For no reason since it's not used in oxnas_nand_cmd_ctrl...
Will remove !

> 
> 
>> +	struct clk		*clk;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void oxnas_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd,
>> +				unsigned int ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	struct nand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
>> +	unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_W;
>> +
>> +	if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) {
>> +		nandaddr &= ~(NAND_CMD | NAND_ADDR);
>> +		if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
>> +			nandaddr |= NAND_CMD;
>> +		else if (ctrl & NAND_ALE)
>> +			nandaddr |= NAND_ADDR;
>> +		this->IO_ADDR_W = (void __iomem *) nandaddr;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE)
>> +		writeb(cmd, (void __iomem *) nandaddr);
>> +}
[...]