Re: 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re: [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'le16')

[Pavel Machek]

On Mon 2016-10-03 21:52:38, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >>tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
> >>head:   596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
> >>commit: 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de [1/1] hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores
> >>config: openrisc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> >>compiler: or32-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.1-or32-1.0rc1
> >>reproduce:
> >>        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >>        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >>        git checkout 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
> >>        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >>        make.cross ARCH=openrisc
> >>
> >>All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >I get it, it does not compile anywhere, because I made a mistake. Ok?
> >
> >But I know now, and if it does not compile on x86, there's very very
> >little chance that it would compile on openrisc.
> >
> >Can we stop the announcements after first or second failure?
> 
> Sorry for the extra noises!
> 
> The build bot will stop complaining after 3 reports on the same
> commit. Shall I further reduce the threshold to 1 or 2? It'll risk
> hiding real different/independent errors though.

I'd reduce the threshold to 2. When I got third report, I thought "hmm
and now I'm going to get 500 more.".

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature