RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: remove redundant CRB_FL_CRB_START flag

From: Winkler, Tomas
Date: Wed Oct 19 2016 - 10:54:41 EST




>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:42:24PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Because all the existing hardware have HID MSFT0101 we end up always
> > setting CRB_FL_CRB_START flag as a workaround for 4th Gen Core CPUs.
> > Even if ACPI start is used, the driver will always issue also CRB start.

Do you have some more historical data about this fix, I was wondering about this quirk before, when restructuring the start method parsing.
The description is ' in practice seems to require both' sounds not certain about the root cause of this.


> > This commit makes the invocation of CRB start unconditional.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 16 +++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> I will include this to the next version of locale series if this is accepted. Just
> wanted to make sure that this is OK before I make the next version of the
> series.
>
> /Jarkko
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > index 65040d7..5928ec8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ enum crb_status {
> >
> > enum crb_flags {
> > CRB_FL_ACPI_START = BIT(0),
> > - CRB_FL_CRB_START = BIT(1),
> > };
> >
> > struct crb_priv {
> > @@ -226,8 +225,11 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf,
> size_t len)
> > /* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
> > wmb();
> >
> > - if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_START)
> > - iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->cca->start);
> > +
> > + /* At least some of the 4th Gen Core CPUs that report only needing
> ACPI
> > + * start require also CRB start so we always set it just in case.
> > + */
> > + iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->cca->start);
> >
> > if (priv->flags & CRB_FL_ACPI_START)
> > rc = crb_do_acpi_start(chip);
> > @@ -407,14 +409,6 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > if (!priv)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - /* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> > - * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> > - * ACPI start and CRB start.
> > - */
> > - if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER || sm ==
> ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> > - !strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), "MSFT0101"))
> > - priv->flags |= CRB_FL_CRB_START;
> > -
> > if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> > sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> > priv->flags |= CRB_FL_ACPI_START;
> > --
> > 2.9.3
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> tpmdd-devel mailing list
> tpmdd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel