Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Oct 20 2016 - 17:31:14 EST

Next message: Dave Chinner: "[4.9-rc1, selinux/audit/netlink, regression?] Warning at kernel/softirq.c:161"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()"
In reply to: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 2/2] timers: Fix documentation for schedule_timeout() and similar"
Next in thread: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Douglas Anderson wrote:

Please wait for a full review and do not send out patches 5 seconds after
the first mail hits your inbox.

Thanks,

tglx

Next message: Dave Chinner: "[4.9-rc1, selinux/audit/netlink, regression?] Warning at kernel/softirq.c:161"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()"
In reply to: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 2/2] timers: Fix documentation for schedule_timeout() and similar"
Next in thread: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]