Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes"

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:

> Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below?

There was only one AFAICT?

> > Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to
> > "thread" okay then?

>From what I see yes.