Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: s3c2410: make ecc mode configurable via platform data

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sat Oct 22 2016 - 11:33:04 EST


On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:27:10 +0300
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:42:44PM -0200, Sergio Prado wrote:
> > > Removing CONFIG_MTD_NAND_S3C2410_HWECC option and adding a ecc_mode
> > > field in the drivers's platform data structure so it can be selectable
> > > via platform data.
> > >
> > > Also setting this field to NAND_ECC_SOFT in all boards using this
> > > driver since none of them had CONFIG_MTD_NAND_S3C2410_HWECC enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common-smdk.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-anubis.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-at2440evb.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-bast.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-gta02.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-jive.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-mini2440.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-osiris.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-qt2410.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx1950.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-rx3715.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-vstms.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 9 --
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/s3c2410.c | 119 +++++++++++++------------
> > > include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-s3c2410.h | 6 +-
> > > 18 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > I acked this twice (v1 and v2)... and still you are ignoring them. I am
> > sorry, I am not gonna to ack this third time!
> >
> > For v2 I acked also other patches but it it is not there as well...
>
> I'll collect your acks (and Rob ones) when applying the patches. BTW,
> how should I proceed with patch 1? Do you want an topic branch
> containing this patch?

I don't expect much work around these files so the risk of conflicts is
rather small. You could put it on a topic branch just in case (so I
could pull in if needed) but I am fine with applying these to your tree
as is.

Best regards,
Krzysztof