Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for cros-ec-sensors

[Olof Johansson]

[once more in plain text]


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 October 2016 09:35:06 BST, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Hi Jonathan,
>>
>>2016-09-03 19:21 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On 01/09/16 08:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Given this dependency I'm assuming the best route for these is
>>via
>>>>>>>>>> the MFD tree...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lee, shout if you want them to go a different route.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIO looks like a more suitable route.  Please provide me with a
>>>>>>>>> pull-request base off of an immutable tag.
>>>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As far as I can tell the precursor patch above hasn't gone in
>>your
>>>>>>>> tree yet which leaves me unable to take this through IIO for
>>now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I'm missing something!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Lee,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any movement on the dependency above?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Last I can find was you adding your ack to it:
>>>>>>> [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: cros_ec: Add MKBP event support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/423
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's annoying.  Okay, well when I send out the pull-request
>>for
>>>>>> this one, I will include you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, better still -- take all of them on one branch and I
>>will
>>>>>> pull from you.  Saves the toing and froing.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. Will probably be the weekend before I get this sorted.
>>>>
>>>> No rush.
>>>>
>>> Ah, I see you ended up with an immutable branch of this anyway:
>>> your ib-mfd-input-4.9 branch.
>>> I'll build an immutable branch on that
>>> ib-iio-mfd-4.9 in iio.git.
>>>
>>
>>Nice, I just saw that the dependencies for this patch series are
>>already in mainline, thanks.
>>
>>I don't see the patches in your iio tree, need I to rebase the patch
>>series on top of mainline and send v5 or you are already taking care
>>about it?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>  Enric.
>>
>>
>>> Unfortunately I don't have an Ack for patch 4 from Olof yet so
>>> can't take that and until I do, the rest makes little sense as
>>> it's not enabled.
> Still looking for an Ack from Olof I think...
>
> Perhaps pm him to get him to take a look.
> I doubt much reading is needed but feel free to confirm that!


Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>


Apologies for the severe delays here. I don't have hardware to test on
for this, so I have to rely on others to vouch for functionality. I
hope to transition maintainership to someone that can pay closer
attention soon.


-Olof