Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: Add SX150X GPIO Extender Pinctrl Driver
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Sun Oct 23 2016 - 06:47:21 EST
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Andrey Smirnov
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Since the I2C sx150x GPIO expander driver uses platform_data to manage
>> the pins configurations, rewrite the driver as a pinctrl driver using
>> pinconf to get/set pin configurations from DT or debugfs.
>> The pinctrl driver is functionnally equivalent as the gpio-only driver
>> and can use DT for pinconf. The platform_data confirmation is dropped.
>> This patchset removed the gpio-only driver and selects the Pinctrl driver
>> config instead. This patchset also migrates the gpio dt-bindings to pinctrl
>> and add the pinctrl optional properties.
>> The driver was tested with a SX1509 device on a BeagleBone black with
>> interrupt support and on an X86_64 machine over an I2C to USB converter.
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&pctl->gpio,
>> + &pctl->irq_chip, 0,
>> + handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH);
> Adding irqchip with IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH triggers a WARN in
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1671, on a custom Vybrid board that I have with
> the chip, so maybe it should be replaced with IRQ_TYPE_NONE? That's
> what I did for my testing and with that change
I fixed this up when applying. It is corect, it should always be IRQ_TYPE_NONE
unless it is a very old driver using boardfiles. The proper type is set up
when the driver using it requests the IRQ.
Some drivers also need to set the default handler to handle_bad_irq
and then also set that up in the irqchip .set_type() callback, especially
those hardwares that have an ACK register for edge IRQs so that a second
edge irq can come in when handling a first edge IRQ. Level IRQs don't
have this problem for obvious reasons, so we need to select between
handle_edge_irq() or handle_level_irq() on these hardwares.
Could you or Neil or both check if this applies to sx150x?
> Tested-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot Andrey!