Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: DW DMAC: split pdata to hardware properties and platform quirks
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Oct 27 2016 - 11:55:23 EST
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 18:34 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> This patch is to address a proposal by Andy in this thread:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
> Split platform data to actual hardware properties, and platform
> quirks.
> Now we able to use quirks and hardware properties separately from
> different sources (pdata, device tree or autoconfig registers)
>
Thanks for an update, my comments below.
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> ÂÂÂ- use separate bool values for quirks in "dw_dma_platform_data"
> instead of
> ÂÂÂÂÂcommon bit field.
> ÂÂÂ- convert device tree properties reading to unified device property
> API.
This should be a separate patch.
>
> I was wrong about DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP flag - it is used to check about
> ongoing soft llp transfer. So DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP flag and "dwc-
> >nollp"Â
> variable have different functions and I couldn't just get rid of "dwc-
> >nollp"
> and use DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP flag instead. So I left "dwc->nollp"
> untouched.
So, then perhaps we may convert it to another flag let's say
DW_DMA_IS_LLP_SUPPORTED.
But this is other story independent of the subject.
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
> @@ -1452,9 +1452,24 @@ int dw_dma_probe(struct dw_dma_chip *chip)
> Â dw->regs = chip->regs;
> Â chip->dw = dw;
> Â
> + /* Reassign the platform data pointer */
> + pdata = dw->pdata;
> +
> Â pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> Â
> - if (!chip->pdata) {
> + if ((!chip->pdata) || (chip->pdata && chip->pdata-
> >only_quirks_used)) {
It's simple as
if (!chip->pdata || chip->pdata->only_quirks_used)
> + if (!chip->pdata) {
> + /*
> + Â* Fill quirks with the default values in
> case of
> + Â* pdata absence.
> + Â*/
> + pdata->is_private = true;
> + pdata->is_memcpy = true;
> + } else {
> + pdata->is_private = chip->pdata->is_private;
> + pdata->is_memcpy = chip->pdata->is_memcpy;
> + }
Would we leave the first part in the place it is now and add new piece
after?
> +
> Â dw_params = dma_readl(dw, DW_PARAMS);
> Â dev_dbg(chip->dev, "DW_PARAMS: 0x%08x\n", dw_params);
> Â
> @@ -1464,9 +1479,6 @@ int dw_dma_probe(struct dw_dma_chip *chip)
> Â goto err_pdata;
> Â }
> Â
> - /* Reassign the platform data pointer */
> - pdata = dw->pdata;
> -
> Â /* Get hardware configuration parameters */
> Â pdata->nr_channels = (dw_params >> DW_PARAMS_NR_CHAN
> & 7) + 1;
> Â pdata->nr_masters = (dw_params >> DW_PARAMS_NR_MASTER
> & 3) + 1;
> @@ -1477,8 +1489,6 @@ int dw_dma_probe(struct dw_dma_chip *chip)
> Â pdata->block_size = dma_readl(dw, MAX_BLK_SIZE);
> Â
> Â /* Fill platform data with the default values */
> - pdata->is_private = true;
> - pdata->is_memcpy = true;
> Â pdata->chan_allocation_order =
> CHAN_ALLOCATION_ASCENDING;
> Â pdata->chan_priority = CHAN_PRIORITY_ASCENDING;
...like
/* Apply platform defined quirks */
if (chip->data && chip->data->only_quirks_used) {
...
}
> - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-channels", &nr_channels))
> - return NULL;
> + if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "is-private"))
As I mentioned above, please do a separate patch for this.
> @@ -183,7 +186,7 @@ static int dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> Â
> Â pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> Â if (!pdata)
> - pdata = dw_dma_parse_dt(pdev);
> + pdata = dw_dma_parse_dt(dev);
Perhaps you might rename the function to something like
dw_dma_parse_properties(dev);
> + * @only_quirks_used: Only read quirks (like "is_private" or
> "is_memcpy") from
> + * platform data structure. Read other parameters from device
> tree
> + * node (if exists) or from hardware autoconfig registers.
Can you somehow be more clear that all listed quirks will be copied from
platform data.
> Â * @is_nollp: The device channels does not support multi block
> transfers.
> Â * @chan_allocation_order: Allocate channels starting from 0 or 7
> Â * @chan_priority: Set channel priority increasing from 0 to 7 or 7
> to 0.
> @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ struct dw_dma_platform_data {
> Â unsigned int nr_channels;
> Â bool is_private;
> Â bool is_memcpy;
> + bool only_quirks_used;
Perhaps add if at the end of quirk list and name justÂ
> Â bool is_nollp;
...here
bool use_quirks;
> Â#define CHAN_ALLOCATION_ASCENDING 0 /* zero to seven */
> Â#define CHAN_ALLOCATION_DESCENDING 1 /* seven to zero
> */
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy