Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:52:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> @@ -456,8 +460,6 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>
>>   out:
>>       mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
>> -
>> -     cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy);
>>       return 0;
>>
>>   fail:
>> @@ -468,6 +470,10 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>       mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
>>
>>       sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
>> +
>> + disable_fast_switch:
>> +     cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
>> +
>>       pr_err("initialization failed (error %d)\n", ret);
>>       return ret;
>>  }
>
> Argh, no indented labels please. Please fix the 3 that snuck in while
> you're there.

Well, you didn't tell me you didn't like them. :-)

Anyway, I can fix this up easily enough.

Any other concerns regarding the patch?

Thanks,
Rafael