Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:52:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:52:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> @@ -456,8 +460,6 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >>
> >>   out:
> >>       mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
> >> -
> >> -     cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy);
> >>       return 0;
> >>
> >>   fail:
> >> @@ -468,6 +470,10 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >>       mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
> >>
> >>       sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
> >> +
> >> + disable_fast_switch:
> >> +     cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
> >> +
> >>       pr_err("initialization failed (error %d)\n", ret);
> >>       return ret;
> >>  }
> >
> > Argh, no indented labels please. Please fix the 3 that snuck in while
> > you're there.
> 
> Well, you didn't tell me you didn't like them. :-)
> 
> Anyway, I can fix this up easily enough.
> 
> Any other concerns regarding the patch?

No, looked fine I think, as did the others.