Re: ILP32 for ARM64: testing with glibc testsuite

[Catalin Marinas]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:22:26PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Regarding ILP32 runtime, my opinion is that it is acceptable for ILP32
> to have extra failures compared to LP64, since these are not
> regressions, but, rather, failures of a new configuration.

I disagree with this. We definitely need to understand why they fail,
otherwise we run the risk of potential glibc or kernel implementation
bugs becoming ABI.

-- 
Catalin