Re: [PATCH] Input: touchscreen: edt_ft5x06 - change msleep to usleep_range for small msecs

[Simon Budig]

On 03/12/16 19:17, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> Since here we are using msleep(1) which is worse as it sleeps for
> minimum two jiffies so 20 ms on HZ=100 system and we are doing here
> 100 retries if register reading fails. So as you can deduce usleep_range
> will serve better here.
> Explained originally here why to not use msleep for 1-20ms:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/3/250

Acked-by: Simon Budig <simon.budig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bye,
        Simon
-- 
     kernel concepts GmbH                 Simon Budig
     Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48              simon.budig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
     D-57072 Siegen                       +49-271-771091-17
     http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
     HR Siegen, HR B 9613; GeschÃftsfÃhrer: Nils Faerber, Ole Reinhardt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature