Re: [PATCH] Input: touchscreen: edt_ft5x06 - change msleep to usleep_range for small msecs

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 07:19:56PM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
> On 03/12/16 19:17, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> > Since here we are using msleep(1) which is worse as it sleeps for
> > minimum two jiffies so 20 ms on HZ=100 system and we are doing here
> > 100 retries if register reading fails. So as you can deduce usleep_range
> > will serve better here.
> > Explained originally here why to not use msleep for 1-20ms:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/3/250
> 
> Acked-by: Simon Budig <simon.budig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thank you.

> 
> Bye,
>         Simon
> -- 
>      kernel concepts GmbH                 Simon Budig
>      Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48              simon.budig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      D-57072 Siegen                       +49-271-771091-17
>      http://www.kernelconcepts.de/
>      HR Siegen, HR B 9613; Geschäftsführer: Nils Faerber, Ole Reinhardt
> 
> 




-- 
Dmitry