Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[SF Markus Elfring]

> Patches 1, 6 and 7 are acceptable.

Thanks for a bit of positive feedback.


> The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different
> from the rest of KVM code.

I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements
for error code settings.
Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes
a bit more?

Regards,
Markus