Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 23/01/2017 10:48, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different
>> from the rest of KVM code.
>
> I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements
> for error code settings.

I'll consider them when your emails stop looking like the output a
Markov chain.

Paolo

> Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes
> a bit more?