Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/235] 3.12.70-stable review
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Fri Jan 27 2017 - 15:54:39 EST
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 08:04:20PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/27/2017, 06:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:55:00AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.70 release.
> >> There are 235 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >> Responses should be made by Tue Jan 31 11:52:54 CET 2017.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > Looks like something slipped in last minute.
> > Build results:
> > total: 128 pass: 115 fail: 13
> > Failed builds:
> > alpha:allmodconfig
> > arm:allmodconfig
> > arm64:allmodconfig
> > i386:allyesconfig
> > i386:allmodconfig
> > m68k:allmodconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> > powerpc:allmodconfig
> > s390:allmodconfig
> > sparc64:allmodconfig
> > x86_64:allyesconfig
> > x86_64:allmodconfig
> > xtensa:allmodconfig
> > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function 'apparmor_setprocattr':
> > security/apparmor/lsm.c:565:29: error: 'largs' undeclared
> Yes, I dropped one apparmor patch and it broke a later patch. I dropped
> it 2 hours ago too, so what is building now on the machines should be
> fine, hopefully.
Confirmed; the latest build (v3.12.69-234-gd7f41d3 ) is clean with no failures.