RE: [PATCH 3/9] staging: fsl-mc: add device release callback

From: Stuart Yoder
Date: Thu Feb 02 2017 - 19:03:02 EST



> -----Original Message-----
> From: upstream-release-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:upstream-release-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 5:43 AM
> To: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@xxxxxxx>;
> Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; agraf@xxxxxxx; Catalin Horghidan
> <catalin.horghidan@xxxxxxx>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@xxxxxxx>;
> Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [upstream-release] [PATCH 3/9] staging: fsl-mc: add device release callback
>
> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx>
>
> When hot unplugging a mc-bus device the kernel displays
> this pertinent message, followed by a stack dump:
> "Device 'foo.N' does not have a release() function,
> it is broken and must be fixed."
> Add the required callback to fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
> index 7c6a43b..6601bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,22 @@ bool fsl_mc_is_root_dprc(struct device *dev)
> return dev == root_dprc_dev;
> }
>
> +static void fsl_mc_device_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = to_fsl_mc_device(dev);
> + struct fsl_mc_bus *mc_bus = NULL;
> +
> + kfree(mc_dev->regions);
> +
> + if (strcmp(mc_dev->obj_desc.type, "dprc") == 0)
> + mc_bus = to_fsl_mc_bus(mc_dev);
> +
> + if (mc_bus)
> + devm_kfree(mc_dev->dev.parent, mc_bus);
> + else
> + kmem_cache_free(mc_dev_cache, mc_dev);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * Add a newly discovered fsl-mc device to be visible in Linux
> */
> @@ -460,6 +476,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc,
> device_initialize(&mc_dev->dev);
> mc_dev->dev.parent = parent_dev;
> mc_dev->dev.bus = &fsl_mc_bus_type;
> + mc_dev->dev.release = fsl_mc_device_release;
> dev_set_name(&mc_dev->dev, "%s.%d", obj_desc->type, obj_desc->id);
>
> if (strcmp(obj_desc->type, "dprc") == 0) {
> --

With this patch applied, you still have this:

void fsl_mc_device_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
{
struct fsl_mc_bus *mc_bus = NULL;

kfree(mc_dev->regions);

/*
* The device-specific remove callback will get invoked by device_del()
*/
device_del(&mc_dev->dev);
put_device(&mc_dev->dev);

if (strcmp(mc_dev->obj_desc.type, "dprc") == 0)
mc_bus = to_fsl_mc_bus(mc_dev);

if (mc_bus)
devm_kfree(mc_dev->dev.parent, mc_bus);
else
kmem_cache_free(mc_dev_cache, mc_dev);
}

...i.e. you are doing the same thing in 2 places. You
need to remove the kfree/devm_kfree/ kmem_cache_free,
here, no?

Stuart